|
We know that
everyone in North Shore City wants the wastewater problems fixed.
Because improving the performance of the sewer network is complex, the
solutions are costly and will take time.
Insufficient rates
were collected in the past to pay for renewing the system. Funds from
the sale of airport shares were used to repay debt and to fund capital
projects that would normally have been funded by loans. Developer levies
are not adequate as most of the cost of the wastewater system upgrades
is for upgrading the existing sewer network.
Residents,
ratepayers and future generations living in North Shore City will fund
the improvements.
We undertook
extensive community consultation because of the large costs involved in
improving the wastewater system and we also had to make choices that
relate to other city projects, such as acquiring new parks and improving
public transport.
We asked the
community to help us answer the following questions:
-
What level of
beach water quality are we seeking?
-
How much money
are we willing to spend?
-
How fast can we
afford to spend it?
Following our
investigation work into the sewer network performance, we developed
several improvement options to present to residents and ratepayers. We
asked the community to tell us their views in several ways:
-
We spoke with
100 people on the streets of North Shore City and spoke in depth about
the problems to another 30
-
We spoke with
hundreds of people at displays and public meetings around the city
-
We met with
interest groups, such as Grey Power
-
We consulted
with iwi
-
We delivered a
feedback form to all North Shore ratepayers.
Information on the sewer network improvement options
(107 KB)
Public feedback
More than 1,500 people returned the feedback form we
delivered and shared their views. The following table outlines the
various options we presented and provides a breakdown of the levels of
support for each option.
|
Option |
No. of people |
Percentage |
Recommended option
65 per cent improvement over 20 years average annual rates
= $740 |
814 |
53 |
|
65 per
cent improvement over 10 years average annual rate = $770 |
162 |
11 |
|
70 per
cent improvement over 20 years average annual rate = $750 |
41 |
2.5 |
|
80 per
cent improvement |
50 |
3 |
|
100 per
cent improvement |
20 |
1 |
|
Do it
faster than 20 years but no specified timeframe or
improvement level |
39 |
3 |
|
50 per
cent improvement over 20 years average annual rate = $730 |
7 |
0.5 |
We got the message loud and clear – about half of
respondents told us they supported our recommendation to target a 65 per
cent improvement in beach water quality and another fifth recommended
spending more to achieve a greater improvement, or to ‘do the job
faster’. Another fifth didn’t support the proposal.
Other key points from the community consultation:
-
Beach water quality is clearly one of the city’s most
important issues and a basic health need. A number of people told us
to make wastewater (sewerage) top priority for now and reduce spending
on less essential projects rather than increasing the rates. Some of
you told us again to "get on with the job".
-
Some believe new subdivisions and infill housing are a
big cause of the problem and want developers to pay more of the costs
in servicing development. Some suggested that growth should stop or at
least be delayed until the sewer network is able to cope.
-
A number (6 per cent) thought alternative technology
was a good idea at the right time, others suggested that council had
not done enough to assess alternative technologies. Some people (3.5
per cent) asked us to address stormwater at the same time because of
its significant effect on beach water quality.
-
Some (3 per cent) asked us to be fair and reasonable
in how we calculate the rates. Another group (3.6 per cent) said they
could not afford this sort of rates increase. There was some concern
by others about the ability of everyone to pay.
-
A number sought reassurance that we choose the safest
and most effective solution at the best price and that council would
continue to fund improvements in the system until the target beach
water quality is achieved.
|